Prohibited dangerous animal objection by James Surrells for Fafo.
Attorney Nycz clarified that the Chief of Police is responsible for deciding
whether an animal qualifies as a Prohibited Dangerous Animal. Should the
animal fit this definition, the Chief orders its removal from the city. The
owner has the right to contest this decision, prompting a review by the
Public Safety Committee. This committee serves as a quasi-judicial entity,
providing the animal's owner or caretaker the opportunity to present
evidence against the classification.
Chairman Beeman outlined the procedures for the hearing.
Chief Reimer presented the evidence, followed by a question-and-answer
session with the board members.
The opposing party, James Surrells, then had the chance to present his
evidence, after which board members were again invited to ask questions.
Both Chief Reimer and James Surrells were allotted time for their closing
statements.
Subsequently, the board motioned to support Chief Reimer's determination
and voted to uphold it. The board finalized the Finding of Facts and
Conclusion of Law, concluding that Fafo had indeed inflicted bodily harm to
an individual on either public or private property.
Moved by Reckelberg, seconded by DeBaets, that this Action Item be placed on
file. The motion carried by the following vote:
3 - Beeman, Reckelberg and DeBaets
1 - Cummings
Aye:
Excused:
6. Adjournment
A motion was made by Alderperson William DeBaets, seconded by Vice Chair
Todd Reckelberg, that this meeting be adjourned at 5:51 p.m. The motion
carried by the following vote:
3 - Beeman, Reckelberg and DeBaets
1 - Cummings
Aye:
Excused: